Howe & Co, are very pleased to announce that Professor Alexis Jay, Chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, today granted three further applications for Core Participant status for clients of Howe & Co. David Enright (Partner and head of Howe & Co’s Inquiry team) said:
“Our team puts a great deal of work into assisting vulnerable victims and survivors to have a meaningful role in this important public Inquiry. I am very pleased that we continue to win recognition for our clients in the IICSA”
Howe & Co are currently encouraging persons who were or who are affected by issues of on line grooming to come forward so that we can assist them in relation to the IICSA’s newly announced Internet Investigation.
The dead line for core participant applications for this vitally important investigation is the 28 July. As such we would encourage any persons affected (directly or indirectly) by child abuse which was facilitated through the internet or otherwise to contact us as soon as possible.
David Enright, Head of Howe+Co IICSA team, lead a large delegation of core participant victims and survivors to the public inquiry's seminar on the fourth and fifth of July this week.
David Enright said "effective and meaningful participation of victims of survivors is vital for public confidence in this important public enquiry. That has been and will remain our central focus in our work in this child sexual abuse.”
Hard copies of the research papers were available at the seminar, and the research papers are very interesting, dealing as they do with the wide range of impacts that child sexual abuse has on victims and survivors across so many areas of their lives.
Inquiry Seminar Agenda 4th July 2017
Transcript Of Inquiry Seminar Tuesday 4th July 2017
Inquiry Seminar Agenda 5th July 2017
Transcript Of Inquiry Seminar Wednesday 5th July 2017
Links to research papers
Click here to The Times today published an article by its chief reporter Sean O’Neill regarding the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, in which Howe & Co represent 25 % of the victim and survivor core participants.
The Times report states that the Inquiry has not published a single report since its inception 2 years ago and despite the cost of the Inquiry to date.
In fact, Howe & Co have been pressing the IICSA for many months to make interim recommendations for changes and improvements to the Civil Justice System, The Criminal injuries Compensation Scheme and in regard of reparations for survivors. As recently as the 8 June, when Howe & co met with the Inquiry’s legal team, Howe & Co raised the need for early recommendations again. We were advised that the solicitor to the Inquiry would be engaged in meetings in the current weeks in regard of making early recommendations and the Inquiry would be publishing an interim report in early 2018.
On the 4 and 5 July Howe & Co will be attending a victim and survivor seminar being held by the Inquiry along with a large group of Howe & Co’s core participant clients.
Howe & Co’s clients continue to demand that there is open, transparent and a clear process from the Inquiry and that information is provided at the earliest opportunity to allow our clients some of which are illiterate, to properly interact with the process and feel that they are part of the process.
We again urge the Inquiry to ensure that the victims and survivors of child sexual abuse are front and centre of the Inquiry. edit.
On Tuesday 4th and Wednesday 5 July an Inquiry Seminar will be held on Victims and survivors’ experiences: impacts of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA), support needs and support services.
The Seminar will hear from a number of individuals, to gather information and views for consideration by the Inquiry on the impact of CSA on victims, survivors and their families; their support needs; and current support provision.
The Seminar will be held in the International Dispute Resolution Centre (IDRC), London and will be live streamed, subject to a five minute delay, on the Inquiry Website. The location will normally be here but this may change on the day.
The full agenda is attached and a participant list will be published once confirmed nearer the seminar.
Howe + Co attend the hearing before the IICSA on the 6 June 2017. The Guardian Report of the Catholic Church Investigation of the IICSA on which Graham, Adam, Martin, Jack and I have been working. The second link is to the transcript of the hearing, our first set of submissions begin at page 19.
It is a very important investigation as the Catholic Church is responsible for he education fo over 900,000 children in England and Wales; and there are serious concerns regarding child protection in Catholic institutions, not least locally in Ealing Abbey and School (whose former Abbot goes on trial for child sexual abuse in October)
www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/1494/view/6 June 2016 Roman Catholic Church Preliminary Hearing Transcript.pdf?platform=hootsuite
David Enright Partner at How + Co.
A full transcript of the seminar can be found here
The Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS) is a national scheme that provides compensation to victims of crime from the public fund, particularly in circumstances where a victim is unable to seek damages from the perpetrator if, for example, the perpetrator is not known, is dead or in some other way unable to be pursued for compensatory damages.
The purpose of the Seminar was to consider the CICS Scheme and in particular obstacles in the scheme that might hinder Survivors in gaining access to the scheme and achieving appropriate levels of compensation, along with identifying improvements that could be made to the scheme.
There were a number of significant contributors to the seminar including:
Myself and Adam Tear of Howe & Co Solicitors
Baroness Newlove, the Victims Commissioner for England and Wales and Michelle Brown, an adviser to Baroness Newlove,
The former chairman of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel
Mark Castle, chief executive of victim support
The coordinator of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers special interest group on child abuse
And a number of specialist solicitors who specialise in assisting Survivors in seeking compensation through the CICA scheme.
In the run up to the seminar I made repeated representation to the Inquiry requesting that core participants (who had weaved anonymity) would be permitted to make contributions directly to the Inquiry’s Panel. The Inquiry maintained a firm line that this would not be permitted and that all comments would have to go through the core participant’s legal representative (i.e. myself).
I continued to press on this issue. I asked Sam Stein QC to contact and speak with Peter Skelton QC, who was to facilitate this Seminar. Sam spoke with Mr. Skelton on the evening of 20 February at some length, and impressed upon him the importance of allowing Survivors to contribute directly to the Panel. Mr Skelton maintained that this could not be permitted and that contributions would have to go through legal representatives.
I fully understood Liz and Brian’s decision not to attend in circumstances where it appeared that direct contributions would not be facilitated. I made it clear to Mr. Skelton that you had not attended for this very reason.
I met Mr Skelton and his junior before the Seminar and impressed upon him again the importance (both to Survivors and to the inquiry) that core participants be allowed to contribute directly to the Panel. I did so in no uncertain terms. I then introduced him to our clients who were in attendance, who also impressed upon him, in the clearest terms, of their requirement that they be able to contribute directly to the Panel.
Mr Skelton agreed to raise the matter again with the Panel and it was agreed that core participants would be able to make direct contributions at the end of each session. As you will see from the Transcript Nigel O’Mara, Peter Robson, Karen Gray and Tom Harding all made excellent and well received contributions.
The four sessions focused on different aspects of the CICS scheme and access to it. It concluded with a session on proposals for improvement. As you will see from the transcript I proposed that the Inquiry make seven preliminary recommendations for change now, and not at some later stage.
We were pleased that the Chair, in her closing remarks, “ We will certainly be making reference to our thinking on this when we publish the report next year. But as I said earlier, we will take into account Mr Enright's comments about timing.” That is to say my submission that the Inquiry could take action on a number of issued very quickly and not wait for the publication of its full report next year.
This is a matter I will be pressing the Inquiry on today when I write to the Inquiry re emphasising the need to take prompt action by making at least some recommendations for improvements to the scheme now.
Once again, we were the only firm of solicitors who arranged for our clients to attend this seminar. Without our work and the efforts of the core participants who attended, there would have been no Survivors in attendance, which would have greatly lessened this seminar.
As the solicitor and Queens Counsel representing almost 20 % of core participants in the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Public Inquiry, we wish to express our grave concern regarding he reports that Counsel to the Inquiry, Mr Ben Emerson QC, is considering his position.
Our many Survivor clients do not, without full and proper consultation, agree with any modification or reduction in Scope of the Inquiry’s Terms of Reference or Scope. Our clients have been, and remain, deeply concerned that the Inquiry continues to make important decisions behind closed doors and without consultation with Survivors.
However, we wish to state publicly that Mr Emerson QC is a distinguished and respected counsel with an excellent track record in large, complex and difficult public Inquiries, such as the highly charged Leveson Inquiry.
We urge the Home Secretary and the Chair of the IICSA, Professor Alexis Jay to listen carefully to the concerns of Mr Emerson, and to provide whatever additional support is needed to allow him and his team to successfully drive forward this vitally important Public Inquiry.
David Enright JP, solicitor representing core participant, said:
“Tens of thousands of Survivors of child sexual across the UK have waited their whole lives for an Inquiry that will provide them with truth, Justice and hold those who blighted their lives to account.
We call on the Home Secretary and Chair of the IICSA to engage actively and urgently to find a way forward that secures the confidence of Survivors and provides the Inquiry’s legal team with the resources and support they need to deliver the justice and truth that Survivors deserve.”
Sam Stein QC, of Mansfield Chambers, said:
“Ben Emerson QC is a distinguished legal counsel who has demonstrated determination, skill and fearlessness in, for example, his examination of powerful witnesses in the Leveson Inquiry. Whereas, those I represent are deeply dissatisfied with aspects of how the IICSA has been conducted thus far, I am certain that Ben Emerson would be an asset to this vital public Inquiry going forward. Mr Emerson brings intellectual weight, honesty and integrity to the
IICSA. I urge the Home Secretary to seek to find a way in which his valuable contribution can be maintained.”
Notes to Editors
David Enright is a partner with Howe & co Solicitors and represents almost 20% of all core participants in the Inquiry. He is a former solicitor of the year, winner of the Liberty and Justice Human Rights award, and a member of the Council of Liberty.
Sam Stein QC, is a part of Mansfield Chambers, and a distinguished Queens Council he is instructed to act on behalf of core participants in this IICSA.
Contacts: David Enright (Howe & Co Solicitors) 0208 840 4688